Viewpoint Wiki - All Viewpoints, No Gatekeepers

This article traces the historical development of the United States Declaration of Independence - from its colonial antecedents through its drafting, adoption, and subsequent influence - as a document and as a political event. For the document's ideas and their interpretations, see Declaration of Independence. For transatlantic reception and influence, see Declaration of Independence - Transatlantic Influence Viewpoint. For comparative analysis of American and French revolutionary declarations, see Declaration of Independence - Transatlantic Difference Viewpoint.

The grievances formalized in the Declaration of Independence accumulated over more than a century of colonial governance. English settlement of the eastern seaboard proceeded under royal charters that granted colonists the legal rights of English subjects, including the right to be taxed only by representative assemblies. Colonial legislatures - the Virginia House of Burgesses (est. 1619), the Massachusetts General Court (est. 1630), and their counterparts in other colonies - exercised taxing authority as a matter of established practice.

The relationship between the Crown and the colonies remained comparatively stable through the mid-seventeenth century, interrupted by the English Civil War and its aftermath. Following the Glorious Revolution of 1688, colonial assemblies operated under an informal arrangement sometimes called “salutary neglect,” in which London largely refrained from active interference in colonial internal affairs.

This arrangement broke down after the Seven Years' War (1756-1763). Britain, carrying substantial war debt accumulated in part from the defense of North American territories, moved to extract revenue from the colonies through a series of parliamentary acts: the Stamp Act (1765), the Townshend Acts (1767), and the Tea Act (1773), among others. Colonial assemblies objected on constitutional grounds, asserting that Parliament lacked authority to tax subjects who sent no members to Westminster. The phrase “no taxation without representation” circulated widely in colonial political writing from the mid-1760s onward.

Colonial resistance organized through committees of correspondence, pamphlet literature, and eventually the Continental Congress, which convened first in September 1774. Delegates did not initially seek independence; the First Continental Congress petitioned George III for redress while affirming loyalty to the Crown.

Armed conflict began at Lexington and Concord in April 1775. The Second Continental Congress convened the following month, assumed direction of the war, and appointed George Washington to command the Continental Army. Congress continued to debate the question of independence through the remainder of 1775 and into 1776, with delegates divided between those favoring reconciliation and those who believed separation was inevitable.

Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense, published in January 1776, reframed the question in explicitly republican terms, arguing against monarchy as a form of government and for American independence as both practical necessity and moral imperative. The pamphlet circulated widely and is credited by contemporaries and later historians with shifting popular opinion toward independence.

On June 7, 1776, Richard Henry Lee of Virginia introduced a resolution before Congress declaring “that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States.” Congress deferred a vote and appointed a Committee of Five to draft a declaration in anticipation of the resolution's passage: Thomas Jefferson (Virginia), John Adams (Massachusetts), Benjamin Franklin (Pennsylvania), Roger Sherman (Connecticut), and Robert R. Livingston (New York).

Jefferson was assigned primary drafting responsibility, a selection Adams later attributed to Jefferson's literary reputation and Virginia's political importance. Jefferson worked from June 11 to June 28. He drew on several sources, including his own draft preamble, the Virginia Declaration of Rights (under simultaneous development by George Mason), John Locke's Second Treatise of Government, and earlier colonial charters and petitions. Jefferson later insisted the Declaration was not original in its ideas but was intended as “an expression of the American mind.”

Adams and Franklin made modest revisions to Jefferson's draft. Congress received the document on June 28. On July 2, Congress voted in favor of Lee's resolution for independence - a date John Adams predicted would be celebrated as the great American anniversary. Congress then spent two days revising Jefferson's draft, making approximately eighty alterations, including the deletion of a passage condemning the transatlantic slave trade that Jefferson had attributed to the King. Jefferson recorded his dissatisfaction with several of the changes.

Congress formally adopted the Declaration on July 4, 1776. The document bore the names of John Hancock as President of Congress and Charles Thomson as Secretary. The Declaration was read publicly in Philadelphia on July 8. Most delegates signed an engrossed parchment copy on August 2, 1776; a small number signed later, and one, Robert Livingston, did not sign at all.

The Declaration as adopted opens with a preamble stating the document's purpose - to explain the causes compelling separation - followed by a section of philosophical premises asserting natural rights, government by consent, and the right of revolution. The bulk of the document consists of twenty-seven specific charges against George III. The conclusion formally dissolves the political connection with Britain and declares the colonies free and independent states.

The philosophical section's formulation - “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” - became the most quoted passage. Jefferson's earlier draft had read “sacred and undeniable” rather than “self-evident”; the change is attributed by some scholars to Franklin.

The list of charges against the King addressed legislative interference, judicial manipulation, military quartering, taxation without consent, interference with colonial charters, and the waging of war against the colonists, among other grievances.

The Declaration was reprinted in newspapers throughout the colonies within days of its adoption. Copies were sent to state assemblies, military commanders, and foreign governments. Washington had it read aloud to the Continental Army on July 9, 1776.

British reaction was largely dismissive. The government did not formally respond; the war was considered the primary arena of contest. The philosopher Jeremy Bentham published a critical analysis, A Short Review of the Declaration, shortly after its publication, arguing that its natural rights claims were philosophically unsupported. Scottish philosopher David Hume had expressed related skepticism of Lockean natural rights theory before his death in 1776.

In France, the Declaration was translated and circulated. French sympathy for the American cause - partly strategic, partly philosophical - contributed to France's formal alliance with the United States in 1778. The Marquis de Lafayette and other French officers who served in the Continental Army carried direct exposure to American revolutionary ideas back to France.

The Revolutionary War concluded with the Treaty of Paris, signed September 3, 1783, in which Britain recognized American independence.

Following the war, the Declaration receded somewhat in political prominence as attention shifted to the Articles of Confederation and then the Constitution of 1787. The Constitution made no reference to the Declaration, and the two documents rested on partially distinct legal and philosophical foundations.

The Declaration's philosophical premises re-emerged in political debate during the 1790s, as Federalists and Democratic-Republicans contested the meaning and legacy of the Revolution. Jefferson, as a founder of the Democratic-Republican Party, invoked the Declaration's principles in opposition to what he characterized as Federalist tendencies toward centralized power.

During the early nineteenth century, abolitionist writers began citing the Declaration's equality clause against the institution of slavery. This usage appeared in the writings of black authors and white antislavery advocates alike. David Walker's Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World (1829) invoked the Declaration explicitly.

Jefferson and Adams died on July 4, 1826 - the Declaration's fiftieth anniversary. The coincidence was widely noted and treated as symbolically significant in contemporary accounts.

As sectional conflict intensified, the Declaration's equality clause became a central site of political argument. Abraham Lincoln, in his debates with Stephen Douglas (1858) and in earlier speeches, argued that the Declaration's premise that “all men are created equal” committed the nation to a trajectory incompatible with the permanent extension of slavery. Douglas and others argued the Declaration referred only to the political equality of the colonists relative to British subjects, not to universal human equality.

Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens, in his Cornerstone Speech (March 1861), explicitly rejected the Declaration's equality premise, arguing that the Confederacy was founded on the “great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man.”

Several state declarations of secession (1860-1861) invoked the right-of-revolution language from the Declaration's preamble to justify separation from the Union, while simultaneously rejecting its equality clause.

Lincoln's Gettysburg Address (November 19, 1863) recentered the Declaration in the national founding narrative, opening with the claim that the nation had been “brought forth” in 1776 - not 1787 - and “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Historians subsequently debated whether Lincoln's formulation represented the Declaration's original meaning or a reinterpretation suited to wartime political purposes.

The Thirteenth (1865), Fourteenth (1868), and Fifteenth (1870) Amendments formally altered the Constitution in ways proponents argued brought it into alignment with the Declaration's stated premises.

The physical history of the Declaration's engrossed parchment reflects its gradual institutionalization as a national symbol. The document was transferred between government offices multiple times during the nineteenth century, suffering significant fading. It was displayed at the Philadelphia Centennial Exhibition in 1876 and subsequently housed in the State Department. In 1921, it was transferred to the Library of Congress and placed on public display. During World War II, it was moved to Fort Knox for safekeeping, returning to Washington afterward.

The Declaration was transferred to the National Archives in 1952, where it has been on permanent public display.

International invocations of the Declaration multiplied through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Ho Chi Minh's Vietnamese Declaration of Independence (1945) borrowed directly from Jefferson's text. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) drew on similar natural rights language, though through distinct philosophical lineages. See Declaration of Independence - Transatlantic Influence Viewpoint.

Some historians argue that the deletion of Jefferson's slavery passage was a strategic concession to southern delegates rather than a reflection of majority opinion in Congress; others contend the passage was removed on literary or logical grounds unrelated to sectional politics. See Declaration of Independence - Slavery Debate.

Whether Lincoln's Gettysburg Address accurately represented the Declaration's original meaning or constituted a rhetorical reinterpretation remains contested among historians. See declaration-controversy-lincoln-reinterpretation-controversy.

The degree to which Lockean natural rights philosophy, republican civic theory, or other intellectual traditions primarily shaped the Declaration's philosophical premises is disputed in the historiography. See Declaration of Independence - Intellectual Origins Debate.

Some historians dispute the extent to which Common Sense shifted popular opinion rather than reflecting opinion already moving toward independence. See declaration-controversy-paine-influence-controversy.

Whether the Declaration constitutes a legally operative founding document or a political statement without legal force within the American constitutional order has been argued in courts and legal scholarship. See Declaration of Independence - Legal Status Debate.

1. Pauline Maier, American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997), 3-46. 2. Bernard Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967), 160-229. 3. David Armitage, The Declaration of Independence: A Global History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), 13-68. 4. Julian P. Boyd, ed., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950), 413-433. 5. Carl Becker, The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1922), 1-79. 6. Thomas Paine, Common Sense (Philadelphia: R. Bell, 1776). 7. John Adams to Abigail Adams, July 3, 1776, Adams Family Papers, Massachusetts Historical Society. 8. Garry Wills, Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1978), 1-35. 9. Alexander Stephens, “Cornerstone Speech,” March 21, 1861, in The Papers of Alexander H. Stephens, ed. James Z. Rabun, reproduced in Henry Cleveland, Alexander H. Stephens (Philadelphia: National Publishing, 1866), 717-729. 10. Garry Wills, Lincoln at Gettysburg: The Words That Remade America (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992), 1-40. 11. Maier, American Scripture, 154-160 (physical history of the parchment). 12. Armitage, The Declaration of Independence: A Global History, 107-145 (international reception and adaptation).