Viewpoint Wiki - All Viewpoints, No Gatekeepers

This article traces the history of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from its origins in the regulatory response to the 1929 stock market crash through its development as the primary federal regulator of American securities markets. See also Federal Securities Law Consensus and Franklin Roosevelt.

Through the nineteenth century and into the early twentieth, American securities markets operated with minimal federal oversight. Stock exchanges, brokerages, and investment banks functioned under a loose patchwork of state laws known as “blue sky laws,” beginning with Kansas in 1911, and under common law fraud principles. The New York Stock Exchange exercised some self-regulatory authority over its member firms, but listed companies faced no uniform disclosure requirements.

The 1920s saw a dramatic expansion of public participation in equity markets. Margin lending grew substantially, with investors borrowing to purchase stocks on thin equity cushions. Investment trusts proliferated, many structured in ways that obscured underlying holdings from retail investors. By 1929, estimates placed the number of Americans holding securities at roughly 20 million.

The stock market crash beginning in October 1929 wiped out billions of dollars in market capitalization over the following years. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which had peaked above 380 in September 1929, fell to a low of roughly 41 by July 1932. Bank failures cascaded through the economy as loan collateral collapsed in value.

Beginning in 1932, the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency, under the investigative direction of Ferdinand Pecora, conducted hearings that became known as the Pecora Investigation. The inquiry exposed widespread practices among major financial institutions, including the sale of securities underwritten by bank affiliates to uninformed depositors, the pooling of funds to manipulate stock prices, and the payment of undisclosed compensation to insiders. Executives from National City Bank, Chase National Bank, and J.P. Morgan & Co. testified before the committee. The hearings generated substantial press coverage and public attention.

President Franklin Roosevelt took office in March 1933. Within weeks, his administration began work on federal securities legislation. The drafting drew on the expertise of Harvard Law professor Felix Frankfurter and a group of lawyers associated with him, including James Landis, Benjamin Cohen, and Thomas Corcoran.

The Securities Act of 1933, signed on May 27, 1933, established a federal disclosure regime for new securities offerings. The statute did not authorize a permanent regulatory commission; instead, it assigned enforcement to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The Act required issuers to file registration statements and deliver prospectuses to investors before selling securities in interstate commerce. It imposed civil and criminal liability for material misstatements or omissions in registration materials.

Separate legislation to regulate secondary market trading followed the next year. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, signed on June 6, 1934, created the Securities and Exchange Commission as an independent federal agency. The Act required registration of securities exchanges, brokers, and dealers; mandated periodic reporting by companies with listed securities; regulated proxy solicitation and insider trading; and authorized the Federal Reserve to set margin requirements.

Roosevelt appointed Joseph P. Kennedy as the first chairman of the SEC. Kennedy, a financier who had himself engaged in pooling operations before their prohibition, served from 1934 to 1935. James Landis, one of the principal draftsmen of the 1933 Act, succeeded Kennedy and served as chairman from 1935 to 1937. William O. Douglas followed, serving from 1937 to 1939 before his appointment to the Supreme Court.

The initial commission consisted of five members: Kennedy, Landis, George Mathews, Robert Healy, and Ferdinand Pecora.

Under Kennedy and Landis, the SEC moved to establish working relationships with the existing exchanges rather than pursue immediate confrontation. The New York Stock Exchange and other exchanges registered under the Act and accepted oversight, though the degree of cooperation was contested in the early years.

The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 extended the SEC's jurisdiction to public utility holding companies, requiring their simplification and geographic integration. This statute gave the SEC authority to order the dissolution of holding company structures deemed unnecessarily complex - authority the agency used over the following two decades to reshape the utility industry.

The Trust Indenture Act of 1939 required that debt securities sold publicly be issued under indentures qualifying under SEC standards, with independent trustees obligated to act on behalf of bondholders.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, both signed in August 1940, extended federal registration and disclosure requirements to mutual funds and investment advisers respectively. These statutes emerged in part from an SEC study of investment trusts and investment companies conducted between 1935 and 1939.

The SEC's workload contracted during World War II as new securities offerings declined. The agency transferred temporarily to Philadelphia in 1942 as part of wartime decentralization of federal offices.

The postwar economic expansion brought increased securities issuance and growing public investment in equities. The Maloney Act of 1938 had authorized the creation of national securities associations for the over-the-counter market; under this authority, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) was organized in 1938 and registered with the SEC in 1939, creating a self-regulatory structure for the broker-dealer community outside the formal exchanges.

The Special Study of Securities Markets, authorized by Congress in 1961 and completed in 1963, examined the structure and practices of American securities markets in comprehensive detail. The study documented deficiencies in the over-the-counter market, in broker-dealer sales practices, and in the qualifications of industry personnel. Its recommendations informed subsequent legislation.

The Securities Acts Amendments of 1964 extended the periodic reporting, proxy, and insider trading provisions of the Exchange Act to large companies whose securities traded over the counter, substantially expanding the universe of companies subject to SEC reporting obligations.

A surge in trading volume in the late 1960s overwhelmed the back-office processing capacity of brokerage firms. The so-called “paperwork crisis” led to shortened trading weeks and ultimately to a wave of firm failures. The Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 created the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) to provide limited protection to customers of failed broker-dealers.

The Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 directed the SEC to facilitate the creation of a national market system linking the various exchanges and over-the-counter markets and eliminating fixed commission rates. Fixed commissions on the New York Stock Exchange were abolished on May 1, 1975 - known in the industry as “May Day” - leading to the emergence of discount brokerage and significant changes in the economics of securities distribution.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, enacted in part in response to SEC investigations revealing widespread corporate payments to foreign government officials, prohibited American companies from bribing foreign officials and established accounting and internal control requirements for public companies.

The SEC pursued a series of high-profile insider trading cases during the 1980s. Ivan Boesky, an arbitrageur who had accumulated large positions based on advance information about pending mergers, agreed to pay $100 million in disgorgement and civil penalties in 1986 and pleaded guilty to criminal charges. Boesky's cooperation led to investigations of Drexel Burnham Lambert and its high-yield bond department, headed by Michael Milken. Milken pleaded guilty to securities fraud and related charges in 1990 and was sentenced to ten years in prison, later reduced to two years, and paid approximately $600 million in fines and restitution.

The Insider Trading Sanctions Act of 1984 and the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of 1988 increased civil and criminal penalties for insider trading and extended liability to controlling persons and employers of traders.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 raised pleading standards for private securities fraud class actions and created procedural protections for forward-looking statements accompanied by cautionary language. The legislation was enacted over President Clinton's veto.

The SEC under Chairman Arthur Levitt pursued initiatives addressing auditor independence, revenue recognition, and the quality of financial disclosure throughout the 1990s. Levitt's efforts to restrict certain non-audit services provided by accounting firms to their audit clients encountered resistance from the accounting industry and Congress.

The collapse of Enron Corporation beginning in late 2001, followed by the bankruptcy of WorldCom in 2002, revealed accounting irregularities of substantial scale at major public companies. Enron had used off-balance-sheet special purpose entities to conceal liabilities and inflate reported earnings. WorldCom had improperly capitalized operating expenses. Both companies had received unqualified audit opinions from major accounting firms.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed on July 30, 2002, was the most significant revision of federal securities law since the 1930s. The statute created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) as a nonprofit corporation subject to SEC oversight, with authority to inspect registered accounting firms and set auditing standards. The Act required chief executive and chief financial officers to certify the accuracy of periodic reports; prohibited certain personal loans by companies to executives; required audit committees composed of independent directors; and enhanced criminal penalties for securities fraud and obstruction of justice.

The financial crisis of 2007-2009 exposed significant regulatory gaps, particularly in the oversight of over-the-counter derivatives and of systemically significant financial institutions. The SEC's oversight of major broker-dealers operating under its Consolidated Supervised Entity program drew criticism following the failures of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 significantly expanded the regulatory perimeter of the American financial system. Provisions affecting the SEC included the creation of a whistleblower program offering financial awards for information leading to successful enforcement actions, extension of SEC oversight to certain private fund advisers previously exempt from registration, and new requirements for registration and oversight of security-based swap dealers. The Act created the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as new federal entities. The Volcker Rule, included in Dodd-Frank, restricted proprietary trading by banking entities.

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act of 2012 relaxed certain registration and disclosure requirements for smaller companies and created a new category of “emerging growth company” entitled to reduced disclosure obligations. The Act also authorized equity crowdfunding and loosened restrictions on general solicitation in certain private offerings.

The SEC continued to develop its electronic disclosure infrastructure, expanding the EDGAR filing system and moving toward structured data formats including XBRL for financial disclosures. Algorithmic and high-frequency trading came under increasing regulatory attention following the “Flash Crash” of May 6, 2010, when major indexes fell and recovered sharply within minutes.

Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets presented novel jurisdictional questions for the SEC beginning in the mid-2010s. The agency brought enforcement actions asserting that certain token offerings constituted unregistered securities offerings and, in subsequent years, that certain cryptocurrency exchanges operated without required registration.

Some historians and legal scholars argue that the SEC's creation in 1934 reflected political strategy as much as regulatory necessity, with the appointment of Joseph Kennedy designed to reassure financial markets rather than signal aggressive reform; see SEC New Deal Debate.

The scope of insider trading liability has been contested in both courts and scholarship, with disagreement about whether the federal prohibition rests on a coherent legal theory or has expanded through enforcement and judicial decisions beyond any statutory foundation; see Insider Trading Legal Theory Debate.

The SEC's failure to act on multiple warnings regarding Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme, despite examinations and complaints spanning years before Madoff's arrest in 2008, has generated competing accounts of institutional dysfunction versus structural limitation; see SEC Oversight Failure Debate.

The classification of digital assets as securities under the Howey test has been disputed by the cryptocurrency industry and by some legal commentators who argue the agency has relied on enforcement rather than rulemaking; see Cryptocurrency Securities Law Debate.

1. Seligman, Joel. The Transformation of Wall Street: A History of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Modern Corporate Finance. 3rd ed. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2003.
2. Parrish, Michael E. Securities Regulation and the New Deal. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970.
3. U.S. Senate Committee on Banking and Currency. Stock Exchange Practices (Pecora Investigation). 72nd-73rd Congress, 1932-1934.
4. Loss, Louis, Joel Seligman, and Troy Paredes. Fundamentals of Securities Regulation. 6th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2011.
5. Cheffins, Brian R. “The SEC and Corporate Governance.” Law and History Review 31, no. 3 (2013): 757-808.
6. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Investor's Advocate: How the SEC Protects Investors, Maintains Market Integrity, and Facilitates Capital Formation. SEC Historical Summary. Washington: SEC, 2013.
7. Mahoney, Paul G. “The Political Economy of the Securities Act of 1933.” Journal of Legal Studies 30, no. 1 (2001): 1-31.
8. Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a-77aa.
9. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a-78pp.
10. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745.
11. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).