User Tools

Site Tools


philippine-american-war

Philippine-American War

The Philippine-American War (1899-1902, with insurgent resistance continuing until approximately 1913) was an armed conflict between the United States and Filipino revolutionary forces following the conclusion of the Spanish-American War. The war began when United States forces and troops of the First Philippine Republic, led by Emilio Aguinaldo, came into open armed conflict in February 1899, after the Treaty of Paris (1898) transferred sovereignty over the Philippine archipelago from Spain to the United States. The characterization of the conflict - as a war of colonial subjugation, a suppression of an insurrection, a war of national liberation, or a benevolent intervention and subsequent pacification operation - remains contested; see philippine-american-war-viewpoint-debate for competing framings.

Current State of Knowledge

Historians broadly agree on the principal sequence of events: the Philippine Revolutionary Government had declared independence in June 1898; the United States declined to recognize that government; hostilities opened on 4 February 1899 near Manila; and the United States formally declared the war concluded on 4 July 1902, though armed resistance by various Filipino forces persisted for more than a decade thereafter. Estimates of Filipino casualties range widely. Military dead are generally placed in the tens of thousands; civilian deaths, including those attributable to famine and disease exacerbated by the conflict, have been estimated by some scholars at 200,000 or more, with higher figures proposed in more recent demographic studies.1)2) The conduct of United States forces, including the use of the water cure and other coercive interrogation methods, concentration of civilians in reconcentration zones, and the Balangiga massacre and its aftermath, is documented in both American military records and Philippine sources and is not in significant dispute as a matter of fact, though its moral and legal characterization remains contested.3)4) The extent to which the war shaped subsequent United States imperial policy and Philippine national identity is an active area of historical inquiry. See philippine-american-war-history for extended historical background.

Viewpoints

* American imperial project viewpoint: The war represented a deliberate exercise of American imperial expansion in Asia, driven by economic interests, racial ideology, and geopolitical competition with European powers. philippine-american-war-imperial-project-viewpoint

* Civilizing mission viewpoint: Proponents at the time and some subsequent analysts have argued that United States intervention, however violent in execution, aimed at preparing the Philippines for eventual self-governance and offered infrastructure, education, and public health improvements that Spanish colonial rule had not. philippine-american-war-civilizing-mission-viewpoint

* Filipino nationalist viewpoint: The war was a war of national liberation and resistance against a new colonial power that replaced Spain; the First Philippine Republic had legitimate claims to sovereignty that the United States refused to recognize. philippine-american-war-filipino-nationalist-viewpoint

* Forgotten war viewpoint: Some historians and commentators emphasize that the conflict has been systematically marginalized in American historical memory relative to the Spanish-American War that preceded it, and that this marginalization has had lasting effects on American self-understanding regarding empire. philippine-american-war-forgotten-war-viewpoint

Controversies

* Balangiga Bells controversy: The removal of church bells from Balangiga, Samar by United States forces following the 1901 massacre and their retention at a Wyoming military base for over a century was a prolonged diplomatic dispute between the United States and the Philippines, resolved only in 2018. philippine-american-war-balangiga-bells-controversy

* Casualty and atrocity documentation controversy: Disputes over the scale of civilian deaths and the systematic or aberrational nature of documented atrocities have persisted in both scholarly literature and public debate. philippine-american-war-atrocity-documentation-controversy

* “Insurrection” versus “war” framing controversy: The United States government's long-standing official designation of the conflict as an “insurrection” rather than a war has been contested by Filipino scholars, veterans' advocates, and historians as minimizing its scale and nature. philippine-american-war-framing-controversy

1)
Brian McAllister Linn, The Philippine War, 1899-1902 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000), 325.
2)
Reynaldo C. Ileto, “The Philippine-American War: Friendship and Formulations,” in Vestiges of War: The Philippine-American War and the Aftermath of an Imperial Dream, ed. Angel Velasco Shaw and Luis H. Francia (New York: New York University Press, 2002), 3-21.
3)
Stuart Creighton Miller, “Benevolent Assimilation”: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899-1903 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982).
4)
Paul A. Kramer, The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006).
philippine-american-war.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki