Viewpoint Wiki - All Viewpoints, No Gatekeepers

This article traces the chronological development of the Indian boarding school system in the United States and Canada, from its origins in 19th-century assimilation policy through its operation, decline, and eventual closure. For background on the broader relationship between colonial governments and Native peoples, see Colonial-Native Relations - History and Colonial-Native Relations - Legal Consensus. For the legal and political status of tribes during this period, see Tribal Sovereignty - History. For the main topic page, see indian-boarding-schools.

Efforts to educate Native American children in European-style schooling predate the federal boarding school system by more than two centuries. Colonial-era missionary schools, including those run by Jesuits in New France and Puritan ministers in New England, sought to instruct Native children in Christianity and European customs. Dartmouth College was chartered in 1769 partly for “the education of youth of the Indian tribes.” In the early 19th century, the federal government supported mission schools through the Civilization Fund Act of 1819, which appropriated money for religious societies to operate schools among Native nations, often on or near reservations, with day attendance rather than removal from families.

The Cherokee Nation and other tribes in the Southeast operated their own school systems prior to forced removal under the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Sequoyah's development of the Cherokee syllabary in the 1820s enabled widespread Cherokee literacy independent of federal or missionary institutions. These tribally controlled schools were largely disrupted or destroyed during the removals of the 1830s, including the Cherokee removal known as the Trail of Tears.

The off-reservation boarding school model emerged from military and missionary precedents in the years following the Civil War. Richard Henry Pratt, a former U.S. Army officer who had commanded Native American scouts and overseen Native prisoners at Fort Marion, Florida, developed an educational philosophy summarized in his 1892 address as the need to “kill the Indian” in order to “save the man.”¹⁾ Pratt founded the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, in 1879, with federal authorization, establishing it as the prototype for off-reservation boarding schools.

Carlisle's curriculum combined basic academic instruction with vocational and industrial training, military-style discipline, and a strict English-only policy. Students had their hair cut, were issued uniforms, and were typically given new English names upon arrival. The “outing system,” under which students were placed with local white families during summers or extended periods to work and practice English, became a defining feature of the Carlisle model and was adopted by other schools.

Following Carlisle's founding, additional off-reservation schools were established, including Chemawa Indian School in Oregon (1880), Chilocco Indian Agricultural School in Oklahoma (1884), and Haskell Institute in Kansas (1884). The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), within the Department of the Interior, oversaw federal funding and administration of these institutions, while religious denominations continued to operate mission-affiliated schools under contracts with the federal government.

The boarding school system expanded alongside broader federal assimilation policy during this period, including the General Allotment Act of 1887 (the Dawes Act), which sought to dissolve communal tribal landholding in favor of individual allotments. By the 1900s, the federal government operated more than two dozen off-reservation boarding schools and a larger number of on-reservation day and boarding schools, supplemented by mission schools operated by various Christian denominations under government contract.

Attendance was compelled through a combination of methods, including the withholding of treaty-promised rations and supplies from families who refused to send children, and, in some documented cases, the use of Indian agents or law enforcement to remove children from their homes. Commissioner of Indian Affairs Thomas Jefferson Morgan, who served from 1889 to 1893, advocated compulsory school attendance and oversaw expansion of the system's regulatory framework.²⁾ Conditions at many schools during this period included overcrowding, inadequate medical care, and high rates of disease, particularly tuberculosis and influenza; school cemeteries at institutions including Carlisle and Chemawa contain marked graves of children who died while enrolled.

Some schools, including Carlisle under Pratt's successors, faced periodic federal investigation into conditions and treatment of students. Pratt himself was removed from Carlisle's superintendency in 1904 following disputes with the Interior Department over the outing system and administrative authority.

Public and governmental scrutiny of boarding school conditions increased following the 1928 publication of the Meriam Report, formally titled *The Problem of Indian Administration*, a study commissioned by the Institute for Government Research and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.³⁾ The report documented inadequate funding, poor nutrition, overcrowded conditions, and excessive reliance on child labor at boarding schools, and recommended reduced reliance on off-reservation institutions in favor of community day schools.

John Collier, appointed Commissioner of Indian Affairs in 1933 under the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration, implemented policy changes associated with the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, including efforts to reduce forced enrollment, permit greater use of Native languages, and shift resources toward reservation day schools. Many off-reservation boarding schools were closed or reduced in size during this period, though the system as a whole continued to operate.

The boarding school system continued in modified form through the mid-20th century, including continued operation of institutions such as Chemawa and several BIA-run schools in the Southwest serving Navajo and other communities with limited local school access. Federal policy during the 1950s, associated with the broader termination era described in Tribal Sovereignty - History, included continued promotion of boarding school placement for some Native children, particularly in regions lacking public school infrastructure.

In Canada, a parallel system of residential schools operated from the 19th century into the late 20th century under joint federal and religious administration, with the last federally run institution, Gordon Indian Residential School in Saskatchewan, closing in 1996. The Canadian system is documented separately and is treated in detail on canadian-residential-schools-history.

Federal Indian policy shifted toward tribal self-determination beginning in the late 1960s and into the 1970s, formalized in the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, which transferred greater control of education programs to tribal governments. The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 addressed, among other matters, the removal of Native children from their families by state and federal agencies, a practice that had continued in modified form through foster care and adoption placements alongside the declining boarding school system.

Most remaining federal off-reservation boarding schools closed or converted to tribally controlled institutions by the late 20th century. A small number of schools, including the Riverside Indian School in Oklahoma and Sherman Indian High School in California, continued operating into the 21st century under BIA or tribal administration with substantially altered curricula and voluntary enrollment.

In 2021, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland, the first Native American to hold a cabinet position, announced the Federal Indian Boarding School Initiative, directing the Department of the Interior to investigate the history and legacy of the federal boarding school system, including the identification of burial sites. The Department's initial investigative report, released in May 2022, identified 408 federal schools that had operated across 37 states or territories between 1819 and 1969, and documented marked and unmarked burial sites at a number of these institutions.⁴⁾ A second volume, released in 2024, expanded the documented death toll and burial site count.

In October 2024, President Joe Biden issued a formal apology on behalf of the federal government for the boarding school system during a visit to the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona.

• The extent to which mortality and abuse at boarding schools resulted from deliberate policy versus inadequate funding and contemporary medical limitations is disputed; see indian-boarding-schools-mortality-causation-controversy.
• Some historians argue that the boarding school system constituted a form of cultural genocide under later-developed international legal definitions, a characterization others dispute as anachronistic. See indian-boarding-schools-genocide-classification-viewpoint and indian-boarding-schools-genocide-classification-viewpoint-debate.
• The degree of agency exercised by Native families and students within the system-including instances of voluntary enrollment and student-driven institution-building such as at later Haskell and Sherman programs-versus its characterization as uniformly coercive is contested. See indian-boarding-schools-coercion-debate.