general-relativity-history

General Relativity - History

This article traces the historical development of general relativity, from its conceptual antecedents in Newtonian mechanics and nineteenth-century electromagnetism through its formulation by Albert Einstein in 1915 and its subsequent experimental confirmation, elaboration, and transformation into a foundation of modern physics. For the theoretical content and current scientific status of the theory, see General Relativity. For the scientific consensus on its validity and scope, see General Relativity - Physics Consensus.

Background: Newtonian Mechanics and Its Limits

Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687) established a framework in which gravity was an instantaneous force acting at a distance between masses, operating within an absolute space and an absolute time that served as fixed, independent backgrounds for all physical events. This framework successfully described planetary motion, tides, and terrestrial mechanics, and remained largely unchallenged for two centuries.

The first serious structural tension arose from James Clerk Maxwell's electromagnetic theory, consolidated in his Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (1873). Maxwell's equations described electromagnetic waves propagating at a fixed speed c through a medium then called the luminiferous aether. If the aether defined the rest frame in which c held, then observers in motion relative to it should measure different speeds of light. Experiments by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley in 1887 failed to detect any such variation, producing a persistent anomaly within Newtonian physics.

Attempts to resolve the anomaly produced important partial results. Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincaré independently developed coordinate transformation rules - the Lorentz transformations - that preserved the form of Maxwell's equations across inertial frames. George FitzGerald proposed length contraction as a physical mechanism. These efforts achieved mathematical consistency without fully abandoning Newtonian assumptions about space and time.

Special Relativity: Einstein's 1905 Paper

In June 1905, Albert Einstein, then a patent examiner in Bern, submitted “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper” (“On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”) to Annalen der Physik. The paper dispensed with the aether entirely and derived the Lorentz transformations from two postulates: the principle of relativity (that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames) and the constancy of the speed of light in all inertial frames.

The consequences included the relativity of simultaneity, time dilation, and length contraction as observer-dependent rather than absolute features. A supplementary paper in September 1905 derived the equivalence of mass and energy, expressed in the relation E = mc².

Special relativity resolved the electrodynamics anomaly but left gravity untouched. It applied only to inertial frames - those in uniform, unaccelerated motion - and said nothing about how gravity should behave in the new framework. Newton's gravitational law implied instantaneous action at a distance, which was incompatible with the finite propagation speed required by special relativity.

The Path to General Relativity: 1907-1915

Einstein later identified 1907 as the year in which he began to think seriously about extending relativity to accelerating frames and to gravity. He described what he called “the happiest thought of my life”: the recognition that a person in free fall does not feel their own weight. This suggested that gravitational and inertial effects might be locally indistinguishable - a principle he would call the equivalence principle.

Between 1907 and 1911, Einstein published several papers exploring consequences of the equivalence principle without yet having a complete theory. A 1911 paper predicted that light would be deflected by gravitational fields and that clocks would run slower in stronger gravitational fields (gravitational time dilation), and proposed these as testable predictions.

In 1912, Einstein recognized that the geometry of spacetime in a gravitational field could not be flat - the Euclidean and Minkowskian geometry of special relativity was insufficient. He began working with the mathematics of curved surfaces developed by Carl Friedrich Gauss and extended to higher dimensions by Bernhard Riemann in the 1850s. Einstein's former teacher Hermann Minkowski had already recast special relativity in four-dimensional geometric language in 1908, a formulation Einstein initially resisted but later adopted.

From 1912 onward, Einstein collaborated with his friend Marcel Grossmann, a mathematician at the ETH Zürich, who introduced him to the absolute differential calculus (tensor calculus) developed by Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro and Tullio Levi-Civita. Their joint paper of 1913, the Entwurf (“Outline”), presented a partially correct theory. It incorporated curved spacetime and the equivalence principle but used field equations that were not generally covariant - they did not take the same form in all coordinate systems, a property Einstein considered essential.

Einstein spent two further years attempting to resolve the covariance problem. He briefly convinced himself in 1913 that generally covariant equations were physically inadmissible (the “hole argument”), then in late 1915 recognized that argument was flawed. In October and November 1915, working in Berlin where he had moved in 1914 as a member of the Prussian Academy of Sciences, he revised his field equations in a series of four papers presented to the Academy. The final, correct form of the Einstein field equations appeared on November 25, 1915.

Independently and nearly simultaneously, the mathematician David Hilbert derived the same field equations from a variational principle, submitting his paper on November 20, 1915. The question of priority between Einstein and Hilbert has been a subject of scholarly dispute.

The 1915 Theory and Its Immediate Predictions

The completed theory described gravity not as a force but as the curvature of a four-dimensional spacetime continuum caused by the presence of mass and energy. The Einstein field equations related the curvature of spacetime (expressed through the Einstein tensor) to the distribution of matter and energy (expressed through the stress-energy tensor).

Among the first results Einstein calculated was an explanation of the anomalous precession of Mercury's perihelion - a discrepancy of approximately 43 arcseconds per century that had remained unexplained within Newtonian mechanics since Urbain Le Verrier's precise measurements in 1859. General relativity accounted for the discrepancy exactly, without free parameters. Einstein reportedly told friends he was so excited he could not work for several days afterward.

The theory also predicted a specific amount of deflection of light passing near the sun: approximately 1.75 arcseconds, twice the value that Newtonian gravity with a particle theory of light would predict.

Experimental Confirmation: The 1919 Solar Eclipse

The light-deflection prediction required observing stars near the sun's disk, possible only during a total solar eclipse. A 1914 German expedition to observe a solar eclipse in Crimea was aborted when World War I began. An expedition planned by the astronomer Erwin Finlay-Freundlich was disrupted when he was briefly interned as an enemy alien in Russia.

The decisive test came after the war. The British astronomer Arthur Stanley Eddington, a Quaker who had opposed the war, organized two expeditions funded by the Royal Society and the Royal Astronomical Society to observe the solar eclipse of May 29, 1919 - one to Sobral, Brazil, and one to the island of Príncipe off the west coast of Africa. Eddington led the Príncipe expedition himself.

The results were announced at a joint meeting of the Royal Society and the Royal Astronomical Society in London on November 6, 1919. The Astronomer Royal Frank Watson Dyson reported that the measurements confirmed Einstein's prediction. The announcement received extensive press coverage in Britain and internationally, and Einstein became a public figure of unusual celebrity. The Times of London ran the headline “Revolution in Science” the following day.

Reception and Development in the 1920s

The theory was received differently in different national and political contexts. In Germany, a vocal minority of physicists, some of whom were associated with nationalist and antisemitic politics, attacked what they called “Jewish physics” - a polemical category that targeted both relativity and quantum mechanics. Philipp Lenard and Johannes Stark were prominent figures in this movement. The attacks were marginal within professional physics but became more significant after the Nazi seizure of power in 1933.

Among physicists, early skeptics included Ernst Mach, whose philosophical influence on Einstein was significant but who died in 1916 without accepting the completed theory. Henri Poincaré, who had come close to special relativity independently, also never fully accepted Einstein's formulation.

The 1920s saw the first attempts to find exact solutions to the Einstein field equations and to extend the theory. Karl Schwarzschild had found an exact solution for the gravitational field around a spherically symmetric mass in 1916, working at the Russian front shortly before his death. The Schwarzschild solution described what would later be understood as a black hole, though this implication was not recognized or named for decades.

Alexander Friedmann, a Soviet mathematician, showed in 1922 that the Einstein field equations admitted solutions in which the universe as a whole was expanding or contracting. Einstein had added a “cosmological constant” to his equations in 1917 to allow a static universe; he later described this as his “greatest blunder,” though the attribution of that remark rests on a secondhand account in George Gamow's memoir and its accuracy has been questioned by historians. Georges Lemaître, a Belgian priest and astronomer, independently derived the expanding universe solution in 1927 and connected it to Edwin Hubble's observations of galactic recession velocities.

Mid-Twentieth Century: Marginalization and Revival

From roughly the late 1920s through the 1950s, general relativity occupied an unusual position in physics. It was accepted as correct but remained mathematically difficult, observationally hard to test beyond the three classical tests - perihelion precession, light deflection, and gravitational redshift - and largely disconnected from the rapidly developing fields of quantum mechanics and particle physics. Of these, perihelion precession had been explained by Einstein in 1915 and light deflection confirmed by the 1919 eclipse expeditions, but direct laboratory confirmation of gravitational redshift did not come until Robert Pound and Glen Rebka measured it using gamma rays at Harvard in 1959.

John Archibald Wheeler at Princeton and others worked to revive interest in the theory in the late 1950s and 1960s. The term “black hole” was introduced by Wheeler in 1967, replacing earlier and less evocative terminology. Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking proved singularity theorems in the mid-1960s showing that singularities - points where the curvature of spacetime becomes infinite - were generic features of solutions to the field equations under physically reasonable conditions, not mathematical artifacts.

The discovery of quasars in 1963, pulsars in 1967, and the cosmic microwave background radiation (predicted by George Gamow, Ralph Alpher, and Robert Herman in the late 1940s and detected by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson in 1964) brought observational pressure that required general relativistic and cosmological frameworks to interpret.

Gravitational Waves: Prediction and Detection

Einstein predicted gravitational waves - ripples in spacetime curvature propagating at the speed of light - in 1916, though he subsequently doubted their physical reality and in 1936 submitted a paper (later withdrawn after referee objections) arguing they did not exist. The question of whether gravitational waves carried energy and were physically real remained contested among theorists into the 1950s.

Joseph Weber at the University of Maryland built the first gravitational wave detector - a resonant aluminum bar - in the 1960s and reported detections in 1969 that were not confirmed by other groups and are now generally not accepted as genuine detections.

Indirect evidence for gravitational waves came from Russell Hulse and Joseph Taylor's discovery of a binary pulsar system, reported in 1975 based on observations beginning in 1974. Precise timing measurements over years showed the orbital decay matched the rate predicted by general relativity for energy loss to gravitational radiation. Hulse and Taylor received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1993 for this work.

Direct detection was achieved on September 14, 2015, by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), a pair of detectors in Hanford, Washington and Livingston, Louisiana. The signal, designated GW150914, matched the predicted waveform for the merger of two black holes with masses of approximately 36 and 29 solar masses. The detection was announced publicly on February 11, 2016. Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss, and Barry Barish received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017 for their roles in the LIGO project.

Cosmological Applications

The standard cosmological model - known as ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) - rests on general relativistic field equations applied to the universe as a whole. The model incorporates the cosmological constant (Λ) reinterpreted as dark energy, along with cold dark matter, to account for the observed accelerating expansion of the universe first reported in 1998 by Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, and Adam Riess, who received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2011. General relativity also provides the theoretical framework within which the properties of neutron stars and the dynamics of galaxy clusters are calculated, and within which the first image of the shadow of a black hole - the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy M87 - was interpreted when released by the Event Horizon Telescope collaboration in April 2019.

Controversies

Some historians of science argue that Hilbert's simultaneous derivation of the Einstein field equations in November 1915 entitles him to co-credit for the theory, while others maintain that Einstein's conceptual development was independent and primary; see General Relativity - Priority Debate.

Some historians argue that the 1919 Eddington eclipse results were insufficiently precise to conclusively distinguish Einstein's prediction from Newtonian alternatives, and that the announcement reflected the scientific community's preparedness to accept the theory on other grounds; see General Relativity - 1919 Eclipse Debate.

Footnotes

  1. Newton, Isaac. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Royal Society, 1687.
  2. Maxwell, James Clerk. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1873.
  3. Michelson, Albert A., and Edward W. Morley. “On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether.” American Journal of Science 34 (1887): 333-345.
  4. Einstein, Albert. “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper.” Annalen der Physik 17 (1905): 891-921.
  5. Einstein, Albert. “Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig?” Annalen der Physik 18 (1905): 639-641.
  6. Einstein, Albert, and Marcel Grossmann. “Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten Relativitätstheorie und einer Theorie der Gravitation.” Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 62 (1913): 225-261.
  7. Einstein, Albert. “Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation.” Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (November 25, 1915): 844-847.
  8. Hilbert, David. “Die Grundlagen der Physik.” Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (November 20, 1915): 395-407.
  9. Dyson, Frank W., Arthur S. Eddington, and Charles Davidson. “A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun's Gravitational Field.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 220 (1920): 291-333.
  10. Schwarzschild, Karl. “Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie.” Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (January 13, 1916): 189-196.
  11. Friedmann, Alexander. “Über die Krümmung des Raumes.” Zeitschrift für Physik 10 (1922): 377-386.
  12. Hulse, Russell A., and Joseph H. Taylor. “Discovery of a Pulsar in a Binary System.” Astrophysical Journal Letters 195 (1975): L51-L53.
  13. Pound, R. V., and G. A. Rebka Jr. “Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance.” Physical Review Letters 3 (1959): 439-441.
  14. Abbott, B. P., et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration). “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.” Physical Review Letters 116 (2016): 061102.
  15. Perlmutter, Saul, et al. “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae.” Astrophysical Journal 517 (1999): 565-586.
  16. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results.” Astrophysical Journal Letters 875 (2019): L1.
  17. Crelinsten, Jeffrey. Einstein's Jury: The Race to Test Relativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
  18. Pais, Abraham. 'Subtle is the Lord…': The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
  19. Kennefick, Daniel. No Shadow of a Doubt: The 1919 Eclipse That Confirmed Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.
general-relativity-history.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki