User Tools

Site Tools


declaration-of-independence-history

Declaration of Independence — History

This article traces the historical development of the Declaration of Independence, from its colonial antecedents through its drafting, adoption, and subsequent reception in American and world history. For the document's text, interpretations, and contested meanings, see the main topic page and the Declaration of Independence Debate page. For the scholarly consensus on its authorship and dating, see the historical consensus page.

Colonial Background: Grievance and Precedent

The Declaration of Independence did not emerge without precedent. Throughout the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, British North American colonists developed a political culture grounded in English common law, the tradition of parliamentary limits on royal authority, and Whig political theory. The English Bill of Rights (1689) and John Locke's Two Treatises of Government (1689) — articulating the doctrine that governments derive authority from the consent of the governed and may be dissolved when they violate natural rights — circulated widely in the colonies and shaped elite political discourse.

Colonial legislatures had exercised de facto self-governance for decades, and colonial assemblies regarded taxation without their consent as a violation of rights inherent to Englishmen. These assumptions became flash points following the Seven Years' War (1754–1763), when Britain, burdened by war debt, moved to extract revenue from the colonies through a series of parliamentary acts: the Stamp Act (1765), the Townshend Acts (1767), and, after a period of partial repeal, the Tea Act (1773) and the Intolerable Acts (1774).

Each round of taxation and enforcement generated organized colonial resistance. The Stamp Act Congress (1765) produced a declaration asserting that taxation required colonial consent. John Dickinson's Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania (1767–1768) argued that parliamentary taxation of the colonies was constitutionally illegitimate. The Boston Massacre (5 March 1770) and the Boston Tea Party (16 December 1773) escalated the conflict from legal argument to direct confrontation.

Immediate Antecedents: 1774–1775

The First Continental Congress (September–October 1774) issued the Declaration and Resolves, asserting colonial rights and calling for a boycott of British goods. When Lord North's government declined to negotiate on colonial terms and the Battles of Lexington and Concord (19 April 1775) opened armed hostilities, the Second Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia. Initially, the Congress pursued both military organization — appointing George Washington commander of the Continental Army (15 June 1775) — and further petitions to the Crown, including the Olive Branch Petition (8 July 1775). King George III rejected the petition and declared the colonies in a state of rebellion in August 1775.

The publication of Thomas Paine's Common Sense in January 1776 substantially shifted popular opinion. Paine's pamphlet abandoned the language of constitutional rights within the British system and argued directly for republican independence and the inherent illegitimacy of monarchy. It sold in the tens of thousands within weeks and was read aloud in taverns and public gatherings throughout the colonies.

The Virginia Declaration of Rights and State Declarations

Before the Continental Congress acted, several colonies moved toward formal declarations of rights and independence. George Mason drafted the Virginia Declaration of Rights, adopted by the Virginia Convention on 12 June 1776. It enumerated inherent rights — including life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness and safety — and articulated the principle that all government power derives from the people and can be reformed or abolished when it fails to serve the common good. This document directly informed the language of the national declaration that followed.

Drafting and Adoption: June–July 1776

On 7 June 1776, Richard Henry Lee of Virginia introduced a resolution in the Continental Congress declaring the colonies “free and independent States.” Congress debated the resolution and, to allow time for wavering delegations to receive instructions, postponed the final vote and appointed a Committee of Five to draft a formal declaration: Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston.

Jefferson wrote the initial draft between approximately 11 June and 28 June 1776, drawing on the Virginia Declaration of Rights, Locke, and his own prior writings, including his draft preamble for the Virginia Constitution. Jefferson presented the draft to Adams and Franklin, who made minor revisions. The committee submitted the draft to Congress on 28 June 1776.

Congress debated and revised the draft over 2–4 July 1776. Approximately one-fifth of Jefferson's text was deleted or altered. The most substantial deletion was Jefferson's passage condemning the transatlantic slave trade, which was removed at the insistence of delegates from South Carolina and Georgia and some northern delegates with commercial interests in the trade. Congress also moderated several passages criticizing the British people directly.

On 2 July 1776, Congress voted to approve Lee's resolution for independence, with twelve delegations voting in favor and New York abstaining. On 4 July 1776, Congress formally adopted the revised Declaration of Independence. John Hancock, as president of the Congress, signed the broadside printing that day. The Declaration was then sent to the printer John Dunlap, who produced broadsides that were distributed throughout the colonies.

The document was publicly read in Philadelphia on 8 July 1776. On 19 July, Congress ordered that the Declaration be engrossed on parchment and signed by all members. Most delegates signed on 2 August 1776; a few signed later. Fifty-six delegates ultimately signed.

Jefferson's Sources and the Declaration's Intellectual Genealogy

Jefferson drew on a well-established tradition of natural rights philosophy. The phrase “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” adapted Locke's triad of life, liberty, and property, substituting “pursuit of happiness” — a phrase with roots in both Lockean and classical philosophical traditions. Some historians, notably Garry Wills, argue that Jefferson also drew significantly on Francis Hutcheson, Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and the broader tradition of Scottish Enlightenment moral philosophy; see Intellectual Origins Debate.

Reception and Dissemination: 1776–1800

The Declaration was reprinted in newspapers throughout the colonies within days of its adoption and was read aloud at public gatherings, military musters, and in churches. Washington had it read to the Continental Army on 9 July 1776. The destruction of royal symbols — statues of King George III were pulled down in New York City and elsewhere — accompanied public readings.

Abroad, the Declaration attracted attention as a statement of revolutionary principle. Translations appeared in French, German, and other European languages. Its influence on the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789) has been widely noted by historians, though the French document differed in its universalist framing and in its relation to sovereignty.

In the years immediately following independence, the Declaration's importance as a living political document was contested. It functioned primarily as a diplomatic instrument and a justification for the revolutionary break, but it was not frequently invoked in domestic political debate during the Confederation period or the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

The Declaration in Early Republican Politics: 1800–1848

The Declaration's status as a founding text rose steadily in the early nineteenth century. Thomas Jefferson and John Adams both died on 4 July 1826 — the fiftieth anniversary of its adoption — an event widely interpreted by contemporaries as providential affirmation of the founding generation's legacy.

Jefferson, in letters from the 1820s, described the Declaration as intended to express the “American mind” and to be “an expression of the American mind” that derived from no single source. Its preamble became a focal point in antebellum debates over slavery, the substance of which is addressed at the Equality Clause Debate page.

The Declaration and the Antislavery Movement: 1830–1865

Frederick Douglass delivered his celebrated address “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” on 5 July 1852 in Rochester, New York, arguing — consistent with his reading that the Declaration's equality language extended to all persons — that its promise of equality stood in direct contradiction to the condition of enslaved Americans, and that the Fourth of July was a day of mourning rather than celebration for them.

The Declaration featured centrally in Abraham Lincoln's political thought. In his Peoria Address (1854), his debates with Stephen Douglas (1858), and the Gettysburg Address (1863), Lincoln argued that the Declaration's proposition that all men are created equal was the nation's founding commitment, that slavery constituted a betrayal of that commitment, and that the Union cause represented its redemption. Lincoln's use of the Declaration repositioned it as not merely a record of colonial grievances but as an aspirational statement of universal principle. Whether this reinterpretation was faithful to the document's original meaning is addressed at the Lincoln and the Declaration Debate page.

International Influence

The Declaration's influence on subsequent independence and rights declarations has been documented by historians across multiple continents. The Venezuelan Declaration of Independence (1811), the Liberian Declaration of Independence (1847), the Haitian Declaration of Independence (1804), and a range of other national declarations of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries drew on its language and structure. The Declaration of Sentiments issued at the Seneca Falls Convention (1848) self-consciously echoed the Declaration's structure and phrasing in asserting the rights of women.

Historiography and the Twentieth Century

Scholarly attention to the Declaration intensified in the twentieth century. Carl Becker's The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas (1922) analyzed its philosophical sources and literary structure. Subsequent historians have examined Jefferson's use of sources, the committee's revisions, and the gap between the Declaration's stated ideals and the realities of American society.

The original parchment copy of the Declaration, after years of public display and varying storage conditions that contributed to significant fading of the text, was transferred to the National Archives in 1952, where it has been preserved and exhibited.

Controversies

  • The extent to which the Declaration's equality language was intended to apply universally or was understood by its authors as limited in scope is a subject of sustained historical dispute; see Equality Clause Debate.
  • Whether Jefferson's deletion of the slave trade passage reflects personal hypocrisy, political pragmatism, or a principled rhetorical strategy is disputed among historians; see Jefferson and Slavery Debate.
  • The degree of the Declaration's influence on the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, and the direction of that influence, remains contested in comparative constitutional history; see Transatlantic Influence Debate.
  • Whether Lincoln's reinterpretation of the Declaration as an aspirational document was faithful to its original meaning or constituted a significant revision is a matter of ongoing historical and legal debate; see Lincoln and the Declaration Debate.
  • The relative weight of Lockean, Scottish Enlightenment, and indigenous political influences on the Declaration's intellectual origins is debated by historians; see Intellectual Origins Debate.
  • The meaning, rhetorical target, and legacy of the Declaration's reference to “merciless Indian Savages” — including its relationship to the Proclamation of 1763, British frontier strategy, and the founders' attitudes toward indigenous peoples — is a subject of sustained historical and political controversy; see "Indian Savages" Controversy.

Footnotes

  1. Becker, Carl L. The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1922.
  2. Boyd, Julian P., ed. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950–. Vol. 1 contains the drafting history and committee revisions.
  3. Danielle Allen, Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality. New York: Liveright, 2014.
  4. Pauline Maier, American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. New York: Knopf, 1997. The authoritative scholarly account of the drafting and adoption process.
  5. David Armitage, The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007. Documents international influence and dissemination.
  6. Garry Wills, Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence. Garden City: Doubleday, 1978. Argues for the primacy of Scottish Enlightenment sources.
  7. Douglass, Frederick. “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” Address delivered at Corinthian Hall, Rochester, New York, 5 July 1852.
  8. Lincoln, Abraham. “Speech at Peoria, Illinois.” 16 October 1854. In Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, ed. Roy P. Basler. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1953. Vol. 2.
  9. Jefferson, Thomas. Letter to Henry Lee, 8 May 1825. In The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Andrew A. Lipscomb and Albert Ellery Bergh. Washington: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903. Vol. 16.
  10. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789. Library of Congress. https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwjc.html
declaration-of-independence-history.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki