The Guide for the Perplexed (Judeo-Arabic: Dalālat al-ḥā'irīn; Hebrew: Moreh Nevukhim) is a 12th-century work of Jewish philosophy and theology written by Moses Maimonides (Rambam), composed in Judeo-Arabic between approximately 1185 and 1190.1) It was addressed to Maimonides' student, Rabbi Joseph ben Judah of Ceuta, and is considered the principal source for Maimonides' philosophical views, as distinct from his legal writings such as the Mishneh Torah.2) The work attempts to reconcile Aristotelian philosophy with rabbinic Jewish theology, addressing apparent contradictions between philosophical reasoning and the literal text of scripture, particularly regarding the corporeality of God, the nature of prophecy, and the creation of the universe. Maimonides stated that the Guide was written “to enlighten a religious man who has been trained to believe in the truth of our holy Law… and at the same time has been successful in his philosophical studies.”3)
The Guide was originally written in Hebrew characters using Judeo-Arabic and was translated into Hebrew in 1204 by Samuel ibn Tibbon, with Maimonides himself consulted on difficult passages during his lifetime.4) It was later translated into Latin by Johannes Buxtorf the Younger (Basel, 1629). The work's reception and its later controversies are treated at length on guide-for-the-perplexed-history.
The Guide is organized as a discussion of biblical terminology, metaphysics, and prophetology, and includes Maimonides' rejection of literal anthropomorphism in descriptions of God, his treatment of the account of creation in Genesis, and his discussion of the Merkavah (the “chariot” vision of Ezekiel).5) A substantial portion of the work addresses the philosophical weaknesses Maimonides identified in the Ptolemaic astronomical model then in use, including the problem of eccentrics and epicycles used to account for the observed motions of the sun, moon, and planets.6) Maimonides argued that astronomers' mathematical models, while useful for prediction, were hypotheses adopted for calculational convenience rather than demonstrated descriptions of the true arrangement of the heavens, and he expressed open uncertainty about the exact number and configuration of the celestial spheres.7) This discussion has been read by later commentators as bearing on the broader question of how Jewish sources relate to geocentric and heliocentric cosmological models, a topic treated separately at Heliocentrism - Jewish Astronomy Viewpoint.
Within Judaism, the Guide became widely read and was the subject of extensive commentary, but it was also a source of sustained controversy, with some communities restricting its study or banning it outright.8) The historiographic literature divides this dispute, known as the Maimonidean Controversy, into several phases extending from Maimonides' own lifetime into the centuries following his death.9) A fuller account appears at guide-for-the-perplexed-history.