Table of Contents

Globalization

Globalization refers to the increasing integration of economies, cultures, political systems, and populations across national borders through flows of goods, capital, labor, information, and ideas. The term is often applied to the acceleration of these processes following World War II and especially after the end of the Cold War, though cross-border exchange has occurred throughout recorded history. Globalization is studied across disciplines including economics, political science, sociology, anthropology, and history, and it remains one of the most debated phenomena in contemporary public and academic discourse.

Scope and Dimensions

Globalization is typically analyzed along several dimensions:

These dimensions interact and are not always separable in practice.

Historical Background

Long-distance trade, migration, and empire have connected distant populations since antiquity. The Silk Road, the Indian Ocean trading network, and the expansion of Islam and Christianity across continents are early examples. The modern phase of globalization is often dated to the European maritime expansion of the 15th and 16th centuries, which established colonial networks linking Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia. A second major wave occurred in the 19th century with industrialization and the expansion of European empires. A third wave is associated with post-World War II institutions and accelerated after 1991. For a detailed treatment, see Globalization - History. For the specific history of colonial and indigenous relations, see Colonial and Native Relations - History.

Current State of Knowledge and Debate

Economists broadly agree that trade liberalization increases aggregate output and lowers consumer prices, but disagree about the distribution of those gains - particularly the effects on wages, employment, and inequality within countries. Research on “the China shock” - a term drawn from the authors' own framing for the labor market effects of Chinese export competition in the United States and Europe - has revised earlier optimism about adjustment costs. 1)

The relationship between globalization and national sovereignty is contested. Proponents of global governance argue that transnational problems - climate, pandemics, financial contagion - require transnational institutions. Critics argue that such institutions are unaccountable to democratic publics and erode the self-determination of nations and communities.

The relationship between globalization and inequality is disputed at multiple levels: between countries (where global poverty has fallen significantly by most measures) and within countries (where wage stagnation and dislocation are documented in several advanced economies). Whether globalization is the primary driver of domestic inequality, compared to technological change or domestic policy, is an open empirical question. 2)

Cultural globalization generates debate about whether the spread of Western - and especially American - commercial culture constitutes soft power, cultural imperialism, or simply consumer preference aggregated at scale.

Consensus Status

There is broad consensus among economists that free trade increases aggregate welfare, as summarized by the Globalization - Economics Consensus page. There is no comparable consensus on the political, cultural, or distributional questions that globalization raises.

Viewpoints

Footnotes

~~FOOTNOTES~~

1)
Autor, David, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson. “The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States.” American Economic Review 103, no. 6 (2013): 2121-2168.
2)
Milanovic, Branko. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016.